Rants
Rants and musings about the two forbidden topics of conversation.
Social Security Changes (bullshit)
So last night I get this e-mail:
> > SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES > > > > It does not matter if you personally like or dislike Obama. You > > need to sign this petition and flood his e-mail box with e-mails > > that tell him that, even if the House passes this bill, he needs to > > veto it. It is already impossible to live on Social Security alone. > > If the government gives benefits to 'illegal' aliens who have never > > contributed, where does that leave those of us who have paid into > > Social Security all our working lives? > > > > As stated below, the Senate voted this week to allow 'illegal' > > aliens access to Social Security benefits. > > Attached is an opportunity to sign a petition that requires > > citizenship for eligibility to that social service. > > Instructions are below. If you don't forward the petition and just > > stop it, we will lose all these names. > > > > If you do not want to sign it, please just forward it to everyone > > you know. > > > > Thank you! > > > > To add your name, click on 'forward'. Address it to all of your > > email correspondents, add your name to the list and end it on. > > > > When the petition hits 1,000, send it to comment@whitehouse.gov > > > > PETITION for President Obama: > > > > Dear Mr. President: > > We, the undersigned, protest the bill that the Senate voted on > > recently which would allow illegal aliens to access ur Social > > Security. We demand that you and all Congressional representatives > > require citizenship as a pre-requisite for social services in the > > United States . > > > > We further demand that there not be any amnesty give n to illegal > > aliens, NO free services, no funding, no payments to and for illegal > > immigrants
E-mail petitions always crack me the fuck up. Who the hell do they think they are petitioning to hm? Who gets the petition once all 1,000 “signatures” have been collected? I understand that to a lot of people, the internet is some big magical thing and these questions need not be asked, but to those of us who know how the damn thing works, how can this not be annoying as all hell? Maybe they’re smarter than I give them credit; maybe they are depending on the NSA to track this and forward it to the president as soon as the required amount of signatures have been collected… but I digress.
Apparently (and, as always) nobody checks their facts. A quick search on snopes.com gives us all the information that we need to know about this. Another thing that always fascinates me about these is their ability to change over time. For example, the original e-mail mentioned President Bush, rather than President Obama (which is funny, seeing as how I never got that one… I wonder why). I wrote a response, but not before harvesting ALL of the e-mail addresses from the message body, to, and cc fields (with the help of sed and grep of course) so I could send my [intentionally provocative] response to every last one of ‘em. I know that I’m fighting an uphill battle, but at least I’m fighting
My response:
So, does everyone believe everything that hits their inbox nowadays? http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/petition.asp DISCLAIMER: I'm about to say some offensive s**t so if you are easily offended, stop reading. ### I mean it. If you read any further, don't reply to me all hurt expecting an apology; your words will fall on deaf ears. ### Last chance. ### Ok, I get it... hating the president is cool now that we have a black guy in office, fine, but seriously people... where the f**k was all this outrage when Bush was raping our constitution, involving us in illegal, unnecessary wars based on lies (Iraq), draining the economy whilst giving enormous kickbacks to his friends (the very people who put his dumb a$$ in office to being with), and spying on each and every one of us under the guise of "national security", huh? where? Nowhere. Don't try to act like you actually care now because it's painfully clear that you're being disingenuous. If you forwarded this to your friends, family, whatever, without first checking your facts then you're an idiot. If you SIGNED YOUR NAME to it without ever even questioning it's authenticity, then you're a bigger idiot. One might argue that it's people like you who are to blame for our current situation---Yes, you. You who bent over and took it straight up the cornhole because "9/11 changed everything" ... you who let your government run wild directly afterwards while you sat by in silent agreement (just as long as we were killing Muslims) ... and you, who probably still do not have a single f**king clue about the damage to our country that the past ~8 years has wrought. Every last one of you should be terribly ashamed of yourselves. Terrorists aren't destroying this country; blind obedience, complacency, anti-intellectualism, and laziness are. Do you really think that... even if the bill mentioned in this e-mail was real, that signing your name to an e-mail and forwarding it to other people actually constitutes some sort of political action? Thomas Paine must be rolling in his grave.
I know that the majority will probably just delete this reply… sadly, they’re most likely the ones who really need to be reading it. Also, there were actually about ten lines above and below each ‘###’ but wordpress ate those. I know that this won’t make a difference though; hell, just a few minutes ago I got a reply (to my reply) stating: “i dont know. i just forward them. i did hear something about that recently on the news.” … two things, (1) No the hell you didn’t. (2) Thanks for proving my point.
Religion and the Army
When I look back at my time in the U.S. Army, there’s always one thing that comes to mind—the religiosity of the majority (in both the enlisted and commissioned ranks). It wasn’t diverse in the slightest; quite the contrary actually. In fact, you didn’t have to look far to see or hear someone making claims that the U.S. Army is a “Christian” army. And not just any breed of Christianity either, we’re talking about the Evangelical kind. The kind that makes a Chief Warrant Officer—supposedly the more intelligent of those serving; chastise and intimidate a junior enlisted soldier (in full view of about 20 other people) for refusing to believe that the Earth is 10,000 years old or less… the kind that keeps the onlookers in that scenario, silent.
I was that junior enlisted soldier, and if you’re reading this Chief Diefenbach, fuck you. You see, you are what’s wrong with the Army (I can’t speak for the other branches because I didn’t serve in them… but I hear that they suffer from the same problems.) The entire time I was serving, I was constantly frustrated by the fact that proselytizing to other soldiers without their consent, and/or discriminating against them on the basis of religion, was technically illegal but nonetheless an accepted practice… after all, there are no atheists in foxholes.
In fact, I can’t count the number of soldiers and officers whom I overheard speculating on the “End Times” during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq; there were many who actually believed that we were going to be fighting in a “holy war”, and to state or argue otherwise could get you into trouble. Aside from becoming a social outcast, you could find yourself the subject of a complaint to your supervisor when one of the end-timers interprets your refusal to believe their bullshit as an open attack on their religion. This very thing happened to me shortly after 9/11. Nothing ever came out of it, but it did cause some minor stress in my life for a short moment.
There were rewards for being religious—or at least pretending to be so. When I was in BCT (Basic Combat Training), the weekends usually consisted of G.I. parties, trash pickup details, cutting grass, etc. Basically, any work that the Drill Instructors could find—except for those who went to church on Sunday. On Sunday morning right after formation, you’d be separated into two groups; those going to church, and those who weren’t. For those of us who weren’t going to church, we’d usually have some mops, brooms, lawnmowers, etc. waiting for us. If you went to church, you got out of about ~3-4 hours of ass-busting manual labor. It’s funny how the chain of command didn’t see anything unfair about this. They also didn’t see anything unfair when a request that few of us non-believers asked to have our own “church” session on Sunday mornings was denied. The official reason was that we needed a chaplain; since we didn’t have one, our only other option was to participate in what was available. They reinforced this position with the logic that; since they didn’t have Catholic, Episcopalian, Methodist, Buddhist, or Jewish chaplains available either, and none of the adherents of those faiths complained about having to attend a [supposedly] non-denominational church service, why should we get special treatment? The flaws in this logic with respect to us non-believers should be immediately obvious.
Rewards for being religious weren’t just limited to boot camp either. Every month or so, our unit (along with other units) would sponsor an event called “A Duty Day With God” where, all you had to do was attend a 1 hour “meeting” in the morning with the chaplain and you’d get the rest of the day off—most of the time, they’d plan a trip to a theme park or some other recreational activity; 100% free to the participants. And if you didn’t attend? Well, I long suspected that this was just a sneaky way of sorting out the “bad apples” but I digress. If you didn’t attend, you had to go to work just like any other day (…and pick up the slack left by the others who weren’t there).
And then there were the Chaplains with their camouflage bibles… the Brits and Aussies whom I served with in Iraq were relentless in their ridicule when it came to the habit that the U.S. Army had adopted, of opening and closing Battle Update Briefs (BUBs) with a [Christian] prayer. Oh sure, it was a non-denominational prayer… so long as your denomination recognizes Jesus Christ as it’s personal lord and savior. This, combined with the utter disrespect directed towards Muslims—by referring to them as “Hajis”, or calling them “Haji” instead of their names—by many of my fellow service members (sometimes candidly; other times, not so much) made it painfully clear that there were many who believed that we were Christian soldiers fighting in a Christian crusade. The use of the word “crusade” by then President Bush, only cemented this idea in the minds of the faithful. The idea that this was a crusade was now beyond criticism because it was endorsed by our president.
Meanwhile for the nonbelievers in the Army, the walls began closing in. After 9/11, I noticed a surge in the level of religiosity of my fellow service members, and the level of religious discrimination increased as well. Our unit started having “Chaplain’s Runs”. This consisted of troops running in formation with the chaplain in front, leading the formation. The chaplain had his own guidon too, with a great big ‘ol cross right in the middle; which was carried throughout the duration. The runs were mandatory and they were opened and/or closed with a prayer. I once had a chaplain call on me to lead the closing prayer… I suspect that this was due to my reputation (it wasn’t a secret that I was a non-believer). He couldn’t compel me to lead the prayer however; I refused (in front of the entire unit). This was just another form of harassment. There were many times, when good-intentioned Christians approached me, wanting to talk about my faith, God, Jesus, etc. And many times I had to tell them that I wasn’t interested—and most of the time I had to remind them that my position hasn’t changed since the last time I told them I wasn’t interested. The kind of reputation I had wasn’t the kind that you’d want while serving in this Army; I was pretty much considered “fair game”. I saw this very thing happen to a few other people too.
So much for the separation of church and State. The U.S. Armed forces are government entities, so this mix of religion and government is illegal, yet, when trying to argue this with your average uneducated soldier, you’ll usually run into the response “But America is a Christian Nation!”. At that point you just need to walk away… I rarely did this though, and it only caused me stress.
The purpose of this post is to inform anyone who reads it that the Army has a serious problem—it has been taken over by extremists. Overzealous Evangelicals and Dominionists who believe the literal word of the Bible—but they have no problem with picking and choosing which passages to follow and which to ignore either. Any part of the Bible that supports their goals is taken at it’s word while other parts might as well not exist. This mentality isn’t limited to just the enlisted ranks or just the commissioned ranks—it’s everywhere. From the lowest ranking private, to the highest ranking officer, you can see it’s influence; you don’t even have to look very hard.
In closing, I’d just like to say that I’m proud of my service. I had plenty of good times, plenty of bad times, and many, many weird moments that seemed defy all logic, throughout my service from 1998 – 2004. I’m just hoping that the Army can rid itself of the fundamentalists who have infiltrated it’s ranks. We claim to be fighting against extremists in our “War on Terror”, but if we are to be successful in defeating extremism elsewhere, we need to defeat it within ourselves. There is no difference between extremists killing in the name of Jesus and extremists killing in the name of Allah.
Further Reading (in no particular order):
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/05/0082488 **added 4/12/2011**
http://donklephant.com/2009/05/04/why-religion-and-military-dont-mix/
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/05/2009542250178146.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/26/us/26atheist.html
http://www.haleyassoc.com/mrffboard/viewtopic.php?p=376&sid=6909b77832f1e4e8011b378d460b931a
http://pluralism.org/research/profiles/display.php?profile=73495
Michelle Bachmann: Once again, full of shit.
Just another “conservative” displaying their utter disregard for fact:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/First-Case-of-Swine-Flu-in-by-E-Nelson-090429-628.html
This begs the question; even if the swine flu outbreak in the 1970′s did occur during Carter’s administration, so what? What exactly are you getting at Rep. Bachmann?
A few thoughts as Arizona residents push for Medical Marijuana
The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes has been a source for heated debates for quite some time now, but recently we’ve seen more states vote on legislation that would make it legal to use cannabis for medical afflictions such as migraines, insomnia, chronic pain, and illnesses that would otherwise be treated by common drugs like anti-depressants, sedatives, and/or opiates. The newest state to join this group is Arizona. Next year’s general election may very well contain an initiative for the legalization of cannabis as a treatment for the sick. This is a very touchy issue, as opponents of the measure tend to believe that cannabis is just another dangerous drug like heroin and cocaine, while proponents claim that the drug, when used responsibly, has less side effects and is more effective than prescription drugs. Personally I have much to say about this whole debate, but I’ll try to keep it short. First of all, the medical effects of cannabis have never been given serious attention, however, I’d venture a guess that people who genuinely suffer from chronic illnesses know their disease better than people who either haven’t or aren’t currently experiencing the same thing thus, they are in a better position to say whether or not a certain treatment works for them. Second, cannabis was made illegal for political and racial reasons—it had absolutely nothing to do with science. Indeed, the technology to accurately test many of the claims made about “the dangers of Marijuana” and it’s effects on the human brain, didn’t even exist when they were made! Third, tobacco and alcohol are known killers yet they are legal. While it’s tempting to say that nobody has ever died from smoking cannabis, I can’t prove it; but if cannabis was as dangerous as we are told, then you’d think that the news would be all over any reports of illnesses or hospitalization caused by long-term usage or overdose… instead we hear about lung cancer, emphysema, cirrhosis, and other illnesses cause by smoking and drinking. Fourth, the idea that you can outlaw something and it will go away is seriously flawed. If there’s a market for a particular item, that market will continue to exist regardless of law. Prohibition will only create a black market and drive up the demand. We should have learned this with alcohol prohibition.
If you can’t already tell, I’m in favor of legalization. You would think that a substance so demonized would have been studied thoroughly—but it hasn’t been. Occasionally you’ll hear about some government funded study confirming all the misinformation that we’ve been told, but how do you reconcile the disparity between that and reality? People are not dying in the streets from smoking cannabis, but according to the government, they should be. Conversely, every now and then you’ll see a report about how scientists in Europe or elsewhere are having success in treating cancer (or some other malady) in mice, but by and large, those reports are not heard by the majority of Americans—this is a taboo subject, but not because there’s a proportionate amount of scientific evidence to warrant such a high level of condemnation.
Thoughts?
Relevant links:
http://newmexicoindependent.com/…
Concerned about the “Serve America Act”?
Are y’all ready for an early-morning cup of ignorance? A little background info first; there’s an e-mail making it’s rounds on the ‘net that contains the following text:
This effort was called the GIVE ACT in the House which has already passed. In the Senate, it’s called the SERVE ACT (#277). Besides the fact that it is a bill that would require every 18-21 year old, male and female to attend a camp and “volunteer” to be trained and taught a government-sponsored ideology, the fact that it is being rushed through the legislature and not reported on by the media, makes me extremely suspicious What’s the rush and why the silence? What is in these bills that they don’t want us to know about? In addition, does it make sense to spend $75 million or more a year to put our young people in camp when we’re in the middle of hard economic times?
Check it out. See what you can find out. But, in the meantime, since they are trying to rush this into law before you have a chance to investigate, call your Senators and tell them to vote, “No” on Senate bill #277, telling them that you object to this bill. The people I know who have already done so have received surprised responses that they even know about the bill.
Let us BURN THE PHONES LINES tomorrow to call our Senators to demand that they NOT vote on S. 277: The Serve Act, when it reaches the floor of the Senate next week. Then, please call all your friends and ask them to do the same; then to call their friends.
When calling Congress, it is best to keep your comments short, like this:
“I am calling to ask Senator _____ to vote NO on a bill that is due to reach the Senate floor next week. The name of this bill is The Serve Act and its number is S. 277.” That’s all you have to say; staffers are BUSY and will not ask you WHY you are stating this.
But you and I BOTH KNOW the reason: This bill is DANGEROUS for our youth, and now also for our seniors. It is not “voluntary” but “mandatory” and we want nothing to do with it!
Here is the news from the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee on this new bill:
http://help.senategov/Maj_press/2009_03_18.pdf
It DOES say that “retirees” can be called into service, too!!
Here is the article on Fox News about the GIVE ACT – the House version that did pass yesterday, 3/18:
Note that SOME House members ARE concerned about the ramifications of this bill on the young.
Finally, here is an article from our friends in CANADA that “spills the beans” on the REAL AGENDA behind these two bills:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9374
Remember the regulation the Department of Defense made last week that would limit ammunition sales and drive the price up as well as create hundreds of lost jobs? It was announced on talk radio last Sunday and both ammunition makers and pro-gun sales people pounced on it, making phone calls, sending faxes, meeting with the proper people and it’s now been shelved – in less than a week’s time from the announcement. We need the same kind of quick action on the SERVE ACT.
Does Hitler Youth ring a bell?
But whoever causes the downfall of one of these little ones who believe in Me – it would be better for him if a heavy millstone were hung around his neck and he were drowned in the depths of the sea!” (Matthew 18:6) HCSB
I believe I’ve located the source but I haven’t been able to confirm that yet—it also could be that the e-mail was the source of the article; who knows. Anyway, aside from the fact that this frantic plea is an obvious piece of fearmongering, I entertained it’s claims long enough to disprove them.
I’m not sure if this e-mail was a hoax or propaganda, either one is equally likely. What we have here is someone mixing truth with fiction—the usual conspiracy bullshit; S. 277 is real, but the claims made in this e-mail are patently absurd. Read the bill. As far as I can tell, the purpose of this bill is to provide incentives for people to volunteer in their communities—that’s a generalization, but the prospect of “involuntary volunteer” camps initiated though this bill, is < 0. Which leads me to the most glaring flaw in this e-mail: if the author were genuinely trying to prove his/her case, then why not link to the actual text of the bill (rather than fox “news” or other questionable sources?) I think we all know why. But it does contain a broken link to a PDF file that supposedly supports it’s claims; there’s just one problem though, it doesn’t. Neither does the linked fox “news” article; and the Canada Free Press article? All commentary, no backup.
I wonder how many people that received this e-mail noticed that the following url: http://help.senategov/Maj_press/2009_03_18.pdf is missing a “.” between the senate and gov portion of the domain name? The website that I cited as the possible source of the text also contains this link and the text portion is missing the dot as well, but the href portion of the link points here:
mailbox:///C%7C/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner.backup/Application%20Data/Mozilla/Profiles/default/ea23c0xc.slt/Mail/west.pop.cox.net/Inbox?number=1608772594
In case you’re interested, here’s a working link to the PDF file that the e-mail references:
http://help.senate.gov/Maj_press/2009_03_18.pdf.
My opinion is that this is just another attempt to associate President Obama’s image with Soviet-style Communism. This campaign has been going on for a while now; every time you hear a Conservative talk about Obama, it’s one of the first things they mention; “Obama’s a commie!!1!1! blah blah blah”, which is really quite sad because in most (read: all) cases, the only thing they “know” about Communism/Socialism/Marxism is that it is “evil”. I wrote a post a while ago about how the majority of Americans don’t know jack about Marxism, Communism or Socialism—the only thing they know is that Soviet Russia was “Communist” and that’s all they need to know about the subject. They aren’t open to any debate about the merits of Marxism or Marx’s contribution to philosophy or society; instead, they are content with blaming acts committed by people who chose to twist and stretch his philosophy to fit their own personal wants on Marx himself. Don’t misconstrue that as an endorsement of Marxism or Socialism… it’s not.
This post has nothing to do with defending Obama or his image—that’s his job, but when I see ignorant shit like this, I feel that it is my civic duty to set the record straight. But I must admit, trying to keep up with the tide of bullshit that I see on a regular basis really tests my limits… that’s why this post isn’t a lot longer.