musashi
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GAT d- s: a? C++++ UL++++ P+ L++++ E--- W+++ N+ o+ K w--- O- M+ V-- PS+ PE Y PGP t 5 X+ R tv- b++ DI+ D++ G++ e* h--- r+++ y+++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Home page: http://www.nefaria.com
Yahoo Messenger: marred duck
AIM: marredduck
Posts by musashi
Opening Terminal Server registry propogation window. (aka: Installing software in windows takes forever)
That’s not a typo. For the past few months, I’ve noticed that installing software or running updates on one particular terminal server that I manage (Windows Server 2003, std.), the updates/installation take hours — in some cases, days. So I enabled windows installer logging and here’s what I found:
MSI (s) (2C:E8) [02:35:44:188]: RunEngine wait timed out
Installer is no longer responding.
MSI (s) (2C:E8) [03:13:14:358]: RunEngine wait timed out
Installer is no longer responding.
MSI (s) (2C:E8) [03:50:44:453]: RunEngine wait timed out
Installer is no longer responding.
MSI (s) (2C:E8) [04:28:14:529]: RunEngine wait timed out
Installer is no longer responding.
MSI (s) (2C:E8) [05:05:44:619]: RunEngine wait timed out
Installer is no longer responding.
MSI (s) (2C:E8) [05:43:14:897]: RunEngine wait timed out
Installer is no longer responding.
Action ended 5:52:07: InstallInitialize. Return value 1.
MSI (s) (2C:30) [05:52:07:859]: Doing action: SxsInstallCA
Action start 5:52:07: SxsInstallCA.
So as you can see by the snippet above, this routine installation took an enormous amount of time. This exact scenario played out anytime I tried running updates or installing software. As it turns out, this was the problem. Simply removing the driver and deleting the following registry keys, and then installing the latest version of the driver (… I was on ~3 something; at the time of this writing, the latest version is 6.1) fixed the problem. Here are the registry keys that should be removed after the driver has been uninstalled (and before the latest version has been installed):
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Hewlett-Packard
HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Hewlett-Packard
This was an extremely frustrating issue — other symptoms included server crashes with an error message about the registry being too large; logging in a brand new user for the first time takes ~15 minutes or so, and a whole host of other performance related weirdness. At first I thought that installing UPHClean would help solve this (the symptoms being registry-related and all) but it may have actually made the problem worse. If you scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page of the previous link to HP’s website, you’ll see the following post:
It is very likely that HP UPD problem replicating tons of registry keys to global default registry hive (.DEFAULT) being related to Terminal Server on which the Microsoft UPHClean Tool is installed. I would recommend to look at the readme.txt with UPHClean and setup an exclusion for svchost.exe/rpcss.dll.
“UPHClean assists the operating system to unload user profile hive by remapping the handles to the user profile hive to the default user hive. For example if a process has a handle to HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-X-Y-Z\Software\Microsoft after remapping it would have a handle to HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft.”
I haven’t had the chance to test this yet, but it does sound plausible enough. There’s also some other posts related to this on HP’s website that are worth having a look at. Here’s the readme.txt that comes with UPHClean. Setting up an exclusion list is fairly straightforward; for convenience, I’ve pasted the pertinent section of the UPHClean readme here:
=======================
Because UPHClean assists in unloading the users registry
hive some services may behave incorrectly. Administrators
are encouraged to test and watch for unexpected behavior.
If unwanted behavior is identified contact the developers of
software that UPHClean identified as preventing profile from
unloading.
UPHClean assists the operating system to unload user profile
hive by remapping the handles to the user profile hive to the
default user hive. For example if a process has a handle to
HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-X-Y-Z\Software\Microsoft after remapping
it would have a handle to HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft.
This allows the profile hive to unload. This may not work if the
application expects data that would only be available under the
specific user profile hive it was accessing since the data will not be copied.
If you find that removing UPHClean stops a particular problem from
occurring then you may be interested in restricting UPHClean from
processing certain handles. UPHClean ignores handles that are
held opened to profile hives for the users specified on the user
exclusion list or by processes specified on the process exclusion list.
These lists are specified using the following registry values:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\UPHClean\Parameters\PROCESS_EXCLUSION_LIST
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\UPHClean\Parameters\USER_EXCLUSION_LIST
Note that since these values are specified as REG_MULTI_SZ strings
you should use regedt32 on Windows NT and Windows 2000 to edit them.
The process exclusion list is a list of process names that UPHClean
should ignore when determining which handles to user profile hives
to act on. Each process name is specified on its own line when
input in registry editor. The process name should be specified the
same way as it shows in Task Manager. Usually this is the file
name of the program (e.g. notepad.exe).
A few process show multiple times in Task Manager. It is possible to
specify that a certain DLL be loaded in the process to allow a selection
of a specific process. This is useful with the svchost process to identify
a specific instance. For example to specify the svchost process that
the Remote Procedure Call (RPC) service is running in on Windows 2000,
Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 you would specify
svchost.exe/rpcss.dll in the process exclusion list
The user exclusion list is a list of user security identifier (SID) or user that
UPHClean should ignore when determining which handle to user profile
hives to act on. Each user SID or name is specified on its own line when
input in registry editor. If specifying a user name you must enter the user
domain name followed by a backslash followed by the user name. For
example RCARONDOM\RCARON to specify the user RCARON from
domain RCARONDOM. SIDs should be specified in the usual string
format (e.g. S-1-5-21-2127521184-1604012920-1887927527-68486).
This is the same string you see under HKEY_USERS in registry editor.
Note that the user exclusion list always includes the following
SIDs: S-1-5-18, S-1-5-19, S-1-5-20. Unloading these profiles can cause
problems so UPHClean will not attempt to process handles to these profiles.
Which processes UPHClean performs handle remapping can specified
using the following registry value:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\UPHClean\Parameters\REMAP_HANDLE_PROCESS_LIST
The list by default contains ‘*’ which specifies that handle remapping should
be performed for all non-excluded processes. This list can be changed to
only include specified processes in the same manner as the process
exclusion list. Processes specified on this list can be preceeded by a ‘-’
character to specify that they should be excluded from handle remapping.
Any handle for a process that is not excluded but has handle remapping
turned off will be closed.
I hope this helps!
It’s that time of year again…
Every year around Christmas time, I notice an increase in the amount of religio-political chain letters that hit my inbox. Most of them from friends and family, and the majority being duplicates (or a slightly modified version of the original) from years before. Not all of them warrant a response, but some do. Yesterday, there was this one:
Only hope we find GOD again before it is too late ! !
The following was written by Ben Stein and recited by him on CBS Sunday Morning Commentary.
My confession:
I am a Jew, and every single one of my ancestors was Jewish. And it does not bother me even a little bit when people call those beautiful lit up, bejeweled trees, Christmas trees… I don’t feel threatened.. I don’t feel discriminated against.. That’s what they are, Christmas trees.
It doesn’t bother me a bit when people say, ‘Merry Christmas’ to me. I don’t think they are slighting me or getting ready to put me in a ghetto. In fact, I kind of like it. It shows that we are all brothers and sisters celebrating this happy time of year. It doesn’t bother me at all that there is a manger scene on display at a key intersection near my beach house in Malibu … If people want a creche, it’s just as fine with me as is the Menorah a few hundred yards away.
I don’t like getting pushed around for being a Jew, and I don’t think Christians like getting pushed around for being Christians. I think people who believe in God are sick and tired of getting pushed around, period. I have no idea where the concept came from, that America is an explicitly atheist country. I can’t find it in the Constitution and I don’t like it being shoved down my throat.
Or maybe I can put it another way: where did the idea come from that we should worship celebrities and we aren’t allowed to worship God as we understand Him? I guess that’s a sign that I’m getting old, too. But there are a lot of us who are wondering where these celebrities came from and where the America we knew went to.
In light of the many jokes we send to one another for a laugh, this is a little different: This is not intended to be a joke; it’s not funny, it’s intended to get you thinking.
Billy Graham’s daughter was interviewed on the Early Show and Jane Clayson asked her ‘How could God let something like this happen?’ (regarding Hurricane Katrina).. Anne Graham gave an extremely profound and insightful response.. She said, ‘I believe God is deeply saddened by this, just as we are, but for years we’ve been telling God to get out of our schools, to get out of our government and to get out of our lives. And being the gentleman He is, I believe He has calmly backed out. How can we expect God to give us His blessing and His protection if we demand He leave us alone?’
In light of recent events… terrorists attack, school shootings, etc.. I think it started when Madeleine Murray O’Hare (she was murdered, her body found a few years ago) complained she didn’t want prayer in our schools, and we said OK. Then someone said you better not read the Bible in school. The Bible says thou shalt not kill; thou shalt not steal, and love your neighbor as yourself. And we said OK.
Then Dr. Benjamin Spock said we shouldn’t spank our children when they misbehave, because their little personalities would be warped and we might damage their self-esteem (Dr. Spock’s son committed suicide). We said an expert should know what he’s talking about.. And we said okay..
Now we’re asking ourselves why our children have no conscience, why they don’t know right from wrong, and why it doesn’t bother them to kill strangers, their classmates, and themselves.
Probably, if we think about it long and hard enough, we can figure it out. I think it has a great deal to do with ‘WE REAP WHAT WE SOW.’
Funny how simple it is for people to trash God and then wonder why the world’s going to hell. Funny how we believe what the newspapers say, but question what the Bible says. Funny how you can send ‘jokes’ through e-mail and they spread like wildfire, but when you start sending messages regarding the Lord, people think twice about sharing. Funny how lewd, crude, vulgar and obscene articles pass freely through cyberspace, but public discussion of God is suppressed in the school and workplace.
Are you laughing yet?
Funny how when you forward this message, you will not send it to many on your address list because you’re not sure what they believe, or what they will think of you for sending it.
Funny how we can be more worried about what other people think of us than what God thinks of us.
Pass it on if you think it has merit.
If not, then just discard it… no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don’t sit back and complain about what bad shape the world is in.
It’s all pretty standard rhetoric and I hadn’t planned on typing a response to it until I left the room to grab a drink. On the way to the kitchen I passed our Christmas tree and realized that I had some explaining to do. So here it is (my response):
I also have a confession:
I’m an Atheist. Some members of my family are Atheists; some are Christians; other are Agnostic. Some of my friends are Atheists; some are Christians; some are Baha’i; some are Agnostic; I even have a few Buddhist and Muslim friends.
It also does not bother me in the slightest when people call those beautiful, lit up, bejeweled trees, “Christmas” trees. I also do not feel threatened (as this message implies I would), nor I do not feel discriminated against.
It doesn’t bother me when people say “Merry Christmas”, just as it does not bother me when people say “Happy Hanukkah”, “Lo, Saturnilia!”, “Happy Holidays!” or any other phrase marking the season. (Many of you have probably never heard of that third one, but I’ll get to that.)
I agree that when people say these greetings to one another, it carries with it a good intent. They do not mean me any harm when they greet me in this manner — even though I am not a Christian, I am not bothered in the slightest when someone tells me “Merry Christmas” because I know that their intentions are good.
I don’t like seeing people get pushed around because of their religion, nationality, creed, or gender. I don’t like seeing Jews, Christians, Baha’is, Buddhists, Muslims, Atheists, Agnostics, etc. being discriminated against because their beliefs differ. *I* don’t like being pushed around because my beliefs don’t match up with someone else’s.
I don’t see anything wrong with a manger scene (or any other religious iconography) being displayed on church or private property. In fact, I celebrate this diverse mix of cultures that we have in the United States — it’s what makes us unique. But I do see something wrong with this idea that Atheists somehow have a problem with this — we don’t. What we do have a problem with is government-endorsed religion. For example, when a courthouse or any other government organization displays religious symbols that are specific to any religion (e.g., the Ten Commandments, the Crucifix, Manger Scenes, Menorahs, etc.) I take issue with this for a few reasons: #1 It’s a direct violation of the Establishment Clause set forth in the First Amendment. #2 It has the effect of excluding anyone who does not belong to those religions on display; it’s like saying that we aren’t welcome in our own country. Just like Christians don’t want to be pushed around for their beliefs, they also shouldn’t work to push around others who don’t subscribe to their religion — even Atheists.
Nobody ever said that America was an Atheist country. Nobody. However the historic record is full of documentation of the fact that America is a Secular country. They’re not the same thing. Secular means that the government is barred from endorsing any specific religion. However lately, it’s become fashionable for many Christians to claim that America was founded on Christianity; when in fact, this is blatantly false. You don’t have to take my word for it; the Quartz Hill School of Theology has written an excellent article about this topic:
http://www.theology.edu/journal/volume2/ushistor.htm
But let me go back to my main point: Christmas. Every year around this time we start hearing so-called “conservatives” decry the “War on Christmas”. They claim that Christmas is under attack from Atheists. I find this claim especially offensive seeing as how I’m an Atheist who does in fact celebrate Christmas. (I’ll explain this later.) For the record, there is no “War on Christmas”. What these people call the “War on Christmas” is actually people — Atheists, Agnostics, and even some fairness-minded Christians — speaking up about the flagrant display of government-endorsed religion that occurs every single year around Christmas time. I can’t find anything about Christianity (or any other religion); any mention of Jesus, nor anything else regarding the legality of government-run institutions being allowed to endorse any specific religion, and I don’t like it being shoved down *my* throat.
I’ve heard many Christians claim that the world is going to hell and it’s all because the world has rejected God. They point to people like me and say “You are what’s wrong with America!” They say “You can’t be a good person if you don’t believe in God!” But they’re wrong on all three counts. You’ll always be able to find the bad things in life if you’re searching for them; just as you’ll be able to find the good things. But if you only focus on the bad, then it’s an easy conclusion to make that the world is in fact “going to hell”. Personally, I don’t think the world is going to hell. I think that as long as there are human beings, there will be a mix of good, bad, and in-between; what we choose to focus on is what will determine our outlook — how we see the world.
We can look at school shootings, terrorists attacks, natural disasters and take the easy route of explanation by saying that it’s all some sort of divine retribution because we’ve rejected God. Or, we can actually investigate each instance and find the real reasons they happened. I’m not going to enumerate those reasons here, but the truth is rarely as simple as you want it to be.
With regard to religious instruction in public schools, I never understood why so many Christians are so adamant about pushing the Bible and prayer down everyone else’s throats while claiming that Atheists are pushing their agenda down the throats of Christians. I never understood how someone can read the Constitution; specifically, the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and conclude that it does not explicitly ban public schools from endorsing religion. Again, public schools are government run institutions — I have no problem with private schools basing their curriculum on a religious premise. But requiring public schools to teach a specific religion simply is to discriminate against people who might not belong to that religion. Many Christians do not care about this — they’re ok with discriminating against people of other religions; however what happens if in the future, Christians are no longer the majority religion in the United States? What happens when, say, Muslims want to teach Islam in public schools? It’s easy to see that religion should stay in the churches, temples, mosques, etc. and out of public schools, lest we create a huge mess for ourselves.
Many of today’s Christians complain about being discriminated against, but every time I hear this, it always boils down to them just being upset because someone else doesn’t want them forcing their beliefs where they’re not welcome. You don’t see Atheists going door to door on the weekends urging people *not* to go to church; if you did, I promise you there’d be a riot. But somehow it’s ok for Christians to go door to door in an effort to push their beliefs. It doesn’t bother me at all when they come though; I just kindly thank them and decline their offer. I’m not rude nor offensive, even though I believe their assumption that they’re doing something good is a bit misplaced. But hey, that’s the price of living in a country where ALL people have the right to believe (or not believe) whatever they want. It’s a small price to pay in my opinion.
But back to Christmas. Why do I celebrate it? I think it’s mainly out of tradition, but I have thought long and hard about what Christmas means to me. In so doing, I’ve had to consider the origin of Christmas, it’s history, and past customs. What I’ve found is that Christmas has gone by many names; it’s older than Christianity (i.e., it’s been around for thousands of years) — in fact, Christians did not “invent” Christmas, and many of the customs we now associate with Christmas, actually come from many different religions that pre-dated Christianity. Even the word “Christmas” is fairly new, the Romans called it “Saturnilia”; Scandinavian and Germanic peoples called it “Yule”; and the Celts and Druids called it “Alban Arthuan”. The most prominent symbol of Christmas — the Christmas Tree, was borrowed from early pagans. My goal isn’t to “deconstruct” Christmas, however I would certainly recommend reading the following articles concerning Christmas, it’s origins and customs. I think you’ll be surprised:
http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/Christmas_TheRealStory.htm
http://www.lasttrumpetministries.org/tracts/tract3.html
http://www.hope-of-israel.org/cmas1.htm
But back to the question at hand: “Why do I, an Atheist, celebrate Christmas?” Because regardless of what Christmas was called in the past; regardless of how people celebrated it, and what it meant to them, I think that we all can agree that the modern day Christmas that we all celebrate is intended to remind us that we need to be better people; that we need to treat each other kindly, and celebrate that kindness by giving and sharing with others. It’s a time that we should all take a moment to think about a world where we all get along peacefully regardless of differing beliefs or politics — we have all year to disagree and argue with each other; this should be the one time during that year where we can take a break from all that and just enjoy each other’s company.
Thank you for reading this, and Merry Christmas!
-c
Lost your house? Can’t feed your family? That sucks. Hey, check out my new Yacht!
The truth has been out for a long time now. Many chose to ignore it because some of it could be left open to interpretation; but right now, the despicable actions of those in congress should be sufficient to remove all doubt as to who really runs the United States. The Republican Party has decided that they would rather withhold jobless benefits from people who are struggling to feed their families, pay their rent/mortgage, or otherwise suffering the consequences of this recession. A recession that is the direct result of unnecessary wars, deregulation, kickbacks, and gov’t contractors being allowed to assrape our treasury for non-existent services during the Bush years. Why are they doing this? Because their corporate masters are demanding it. You see, the wealthy “elites” don’t want to give up the very thing that allowed them to get disgustingly rich during the Bush years — the Bush tax cuts. Those same cuts that were responsible for wage stagnation and an overall decline in available jobs in the U.S. from 2000 ~ 2008. Republicans in the house and the senate are very aware of who put them in power. They’re also aware that if they want to stay in power they’d better do what they’re told. Meanwhile, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer while the middle class fades away. “But the rich create jobs!” Bullshit. If this were true, then please explain the decline in jobs during the Bush years. Even better, take a look at the people who are adamant about this lie: The rich and those who stand to gain by supporting the rich. I’m unable to comprehend the level of cognitive dissonance required to stay willfully blind to this fact. But as the saying goes “never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups” … certain elements of the general public continue to vote against their best interests because it’s easier to be told what to think than to actually think about these issues on their own. Just to clarify, yes, I’m calling you fucking stupid if you actually believe the bullshit coming from the Republican Party, Tea Party, and like-minded groups. Oh I know that name-calling isn’t constructive, but trying to reason with you fucking retards has gotten the rest of us absolutely nowhere — “You should never argue with and idiot, they’ll just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” Never have truer words been spoken.
Welcome to the United Fascist States of America, where lies are true, love is hate, war is peace, the obscenely rich are “barely making it”, and being poor is always the result of your own laziness… you should have worked just a bit harder! Factors beyond your control? Horsefeathers! The rich tanked the economy? Bullshit! Predatory lending practices? Lies! You had a run of bad luck? That sounds like you’re just trying to cover up for your own failures! Your wife/husband came down with cancer which caused you to go bankrupt because the insurance company refused to cover the cost of treatment and instead, cancelled your policy due to a “clerical error” (i.e., their middle name wasn’t completely spelled out on the application or some other bullshit like that) ??? Not in the U.S. of A., we have the best healthcare system in the world! No friend, you went bankrupt because of your own recklessness. You deserve to be poor, now give your vote to my puppet so I can keep pulling his strings.
The upper 2% have this country by the balls, unless something drastic happens very soon, we’re all fucked.
Today’s Relevant Quote
“When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental — men whose whole thinking is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack or be lost… All the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum. The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” — H.L. Mencken